Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, if it isn't too long. It is interesting and valuable, but most of the value lies in facts that are already well known.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1936].

Endorsed on verso as received 8 July 1835.

Reference number
RR/55/32
Earliest possible date
July 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Stephen Goodrich

View page for Edwin Stephen Goodrich

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Stephen Goodrich, Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'Studies in tunicate development. Part V - The evolution and classification of ascidians' by Norman John Berrill, July 1935, RR/55/32, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_55_32/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-studies-in-tunicate-development-part-v-the-evolution-and-classification-of-ascidians-by-norman-john-berrill, accessed on 23 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_55_32/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-studies-in-tunicate-development-part-v-the-evolution-and-classification-of-ascidians-by-norman-john-berrill" title="Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'Studies in tunicate development. Part V - The evolution and classification of ascidians' by Norman John Berrill" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection