Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by James Chadwick, on a paper 'Elastic and unilastic cross sections of the mercury atom' by F L Arnot and G O Baines

Reference number: RR/55/13

Date: March 1935

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. The paper is 'somewhat long but very clear'. No modifications are needed.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1935].

Endorsed on verso as received 1 April 1935.

Reference number
RR/55/13
Earliest possible date
March 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Chadwick

View page for James Chadwick

Use this record

Citation

James Chadwick, Referee's report by James Chadwick, on a paper 'Elastic and unilastic cross sections of the mercury atom' by F L Arnot and G O Baines, March 1935, RR/55/13, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_55_13/referees-report-by-james-chadwick-on-a-paper-elastic-and-unilastic-cross-sections-of-the-mercury-atom-by-f-l-arnot-and-g-o-baines, accessed on 19 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_55_13/referees-report-by-james-chadwick-on-a-paper-elastic-and-unilastic-cross-sections-of-the-mercury-atom-by-f-l-arnot-and-g-o-baines" title="Referee's report by James Chadwick, on a paper 'Elastic and unilastic cross sections of the mercury atom' by F L Arnot and G O Baines" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection