Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

He cannot criticise the paper from a botanical point of view. The structural ideas seem sound and probable. From a physical point of view it is 'interesting but hardly worth such elaborate publication'.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1934].

Endorsed on verso as received 10 February 1934.

Reference number
RR/54/89
Earliest possible date
February 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Paget Thomson

View page for George Paget Thomson

Use this record

Citation

George Paget Thomson, Referee's report by George Paget Thomson, on a paper 'The organization of the cell wall of the conifer tracheid' by Reginald Dawson Preston, February 1934, RR/54/89, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_54_89/referees-report-by-george-paget-thomson-on-a-paper-the-organization-of-the-cell-wall-of-the-conifer-tracheid-by-reginald-dawson-preston, accessed on 05 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_54_89/referees-report-by-george-paget-thomson-on-a-paper-the-organization-of-the-cell-wall-of-the-conifer-tracheid-by-reginald-dawson-preston" title="Referee's report by George Paget Thomson, on a paper 'The organization of the cell wall of the conifer tracheid' by Reginald Dawson Preston" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection