Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Not recommended for publication in Proceedings. The range of individual is wide and evidence should be in the paper upon which the conclusions are based. The paper doesn't warrant double publication, as suggested.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 16 April 1935.

Reference number
RR/54/66
Earliest possible date
12 April 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and note on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

Major Greenwood

View page for Major Greenwood

Use this record

Citation

Major Greenwood, Second referee's report by Major Greenwood, on a paper 'The energy output of coal miners during work and its relation to ford requirements' by K N Moss, 12 April 1935, RR/54/66, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_54_66/second-referees-report-by-major-greenwood-on-a-paper-the-energy-output-of-coal-miners-during-work-and-its-relation-to-ford-requirements-by-k-n-moss, accessed on 04 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_54_66/second-referees-report-by-major-greenwood-on-a-paper-the-energy-output-of-coal-miners-during-work-and-its-relation-to-ford-requirements-by-k-n-moss" title="Second referee's report by Major Greenwood, on a paper 'The energy output of coal miners during work and its relation to ford requirements' by K N Moss" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection