Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Proceedings.The paper has been improved since his previous report. The author's attention should be drawn to the work of Kolthoff.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1935].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 May 1935.

Reference number
RR/54/56
Earliest possible date
May 1935
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Slater Price

View page for Thomas Slater Price

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Slater Price, Second referee's report by Thomas Slater Price, on a paper 'The formation and constitution of crystals of lead salts containing water-soluble colloid' by F D Miles, May 1935, RR/54/56, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_54_56/second-referees-report-by-thomas-slater-price-on-a-paper-the-formation-and-constitution-of-crystals-of-lead-salts-containing-water-soluble-colloid-by-f-d-miles, accessed on 14 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_54_56/second-referees-report-by-thomas-slater-price-on-a-paper-the-formation-and-constitution-of-crystals-of-lead-salts-containing-water-soluble-colloid-by-f-d-miles" title="Second referee's report by Thomas Slater Price, on a paper 'The formation and constitution of crystals of lead salts containing water-soluble colloid' by F D Miles" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection