Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests reducing the length of the introduction and summary. Suggests seeking the opinion of Frederic Charles Bartlett of the British Journal of Psychology.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 26 May 1934.

Reference number
RR/53/85
Earliest possible date
May 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Hamilton Hartridge

View page for Hamilton Hartridge

Use this record

Citation

Hamilton Hartridge, Referee's report by Hamilton Hartridge, on a paper 'An experimental investigation of the measurability of visual sensation' by F H Gage, May 1934, RR/53/85, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_53_85/referees-report-by-hamilton-hartridge-on-a-paper-an-experimental-investigation-of-the-measurability-of-visual-sensation-by-f-h-gage, accessed on 28 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_53_85/referees-report-by-hamilton-hartridge-on-a-paper-an-experimental-investigation-of-the-measurability-of-visual-sensation-by-f-h-gage" title="Referee's report by Hamilton Hartridge, on a paper 'An experimental investigation of the measurability of visual sensation' by F H Gage" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection