Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Assumes Joseph Barcroft and Wing Commander Marshall gave consent for the experiments to be published. Suggests omitting the experiments on Mark Ridge, under the direction of Silbe Gorman and Robert Davis, who are not yet ready to publish.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 21 February 1934.

Reference number
RR/53/112
Earliest possible date
February 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Scott Haldane

View page for John Scott Haldane

Use this record

Citation

John Scott Haldane, Referee's report by John Scott Haldane, on a paper 'The limit of high flying when breathing oxygen' by Leonard Erskine Hill, February 1934, RR/53/112, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_53_112/referees-report-by-john-scott-haldane-on-a-paper-the-limit-of-high-flying-when-breathing-oxygen-by-leonard-erskine-hill, accessed on 22 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_53_112/referees-report-by-john-scott-haldane-on-a-paper-the-limit-of-high-flying-when-breathing-oxygen-by-leonard-erskine-hill" title="Referee's report by John Scott Haldane, on a paper 'The limit of high flying when breathing oxygen' by Leonard Erskine Hill" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection