Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. The author should be asked why he presents the electrons of the triple bond in the form that he does.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1934].

Endorsed on verso as received 19 February 1934.

Reference number
RR/52/98
Earliest possible date
17 February 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Martin Lowry

View page for Thomas Martin Lowry

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Martin Lowry, Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'Structures of the metallic carbonyl and nitrosyl compounds' by Nevil Vincent Sidgwick and Richard William Bailey, 17 February 1934, RR/52/98, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_52_98/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-structures-of-the-metallic-carbonyl-and-nitrosyl-compounds-by-nevil-vincent-sidgwick-and-richard-william-bailey, accessed on 18 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_52_98/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-structures-of-the-metallic-carbonyl-and-nitrosyl-compounds-by-nevil-vincent-sidgwick-and-richard-william-bailey" title="Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'Structures of the metallic carbonyl and nitrosyl compounds' by Nevil Vincent Sidgwick and Richard William Bailey" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection