Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, in full. Some minor modifications may be required. but abbreviating the paper would decrease its value.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1935].

Endorsed on verso as received 30 May 1934.

Reference number
RR/52/90
Earliest possible date
May 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Thomas Wilson

View page for James Thomas Wilson

Use this record

Citation

James Thomas Wilson, Referee's report by James Thomas Wilson, on a paper 'On diencephalic and mesencephalic nuclei and fibre paths in the brains of three deep sea fish' by William M Shanklin, May 1934, RR/52/90, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_52_90/referees-report-by-james-thomas-wilson-on-a-paper-on-diencephalic-and-mesencephalic-nuclei-and-fibre-paths-in-the-brains-of-three-deep-sea-fish-by-william-m-shanklin, accessed on 03 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_52_90/referees-report-by-james-thomas-wilson-on-a-paper-on-diencephalic-and-mesencephalic-nuclei-and-fibre-paths-in-the-brains-of-three-deep-sea-fish-by-william-m-shanklin" title="Referee's report by James Thomas Wilson, on a paper 'On diencephalic and mesencephalic nuclei and fibre paths in the brains of three deep sea fish' by William M Shanklin" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection