Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by James Alexander Murray, on a paper 'Action of X-rays on the eggs of calliphora' by C M Scott

Reference number: RR/52/85

Date: 06 February 1934

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. Some of the tables should be omitted. A small correction is required regarding word choice.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1934].

Endorsed on verso as received 8 February 1934.

Reference number
RR/52/85
Earliest possible date
06 February 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Alexander Murray

View page for James Alexander Murray

Use this record

Citation

James Alexander Murray, Referee's report by James Alexander Murray, on a paper 'Action of X-rays on the eggs of calliphora' by C M Scott, 06 February 1934, RR/52/85, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_52_85/referees-report-by-james-alexander-murray-on-a-paper-action-of-x-rays-on-the-eggs-of-calliphora-by-c-m-scott, accessed on 24 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_52_85/referees-report-by-james-alexander-murray-on-a-paper-action-of-x-rays-on-the-eggs-of-calliphora-by-c-m-scott" title="Referee's report by James Alexander Murray, on a paper 'Action of X-rays on the eggs of calliphora' by C M Scott" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection