Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. Doesn't agree with the author's statement that Hogben's tables are incorrect. The case is complicated and 'can only be settled by a very full discussion'.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1935].

Endorsed on verso as received 26 October 1934.

Reference number
RR/52/40
Earliest possible date
October 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Burdon Sanderson Haldane

View page for John Burdon Sanderson Haldane

Use this record

Citation

John Burdon Sanderson Haldane, Referee's report by John Burdon Sanderson Haldane, on a paper 'The detection of linkage in human families' by Felix Bernstein and Richard Machol, October 1934, RR/52/40, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_52_40/referees-report-by-john-burdon-sanderson-haldane-on-a-paper-the-detection-of-linkage-in-human-families-by-felix-bernstein-and-richard-machol, accessed on 14 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_52_40/referees-report-by-john-burdon-sanderson-haldane-on-a-paper-the-detection-of-linkage-in-human-families-by-felix-bernstein-and-richard-machol" title="Referee's report by John Burdon Sanderson Haldane, on a paper 'The detection of linkage in human families' by Felix Bernstein and Richard Machol" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection