Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests some of the figures be returned to the author for reconsideration.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1933]

Endorsed on verso as received 2 June 1933.

Reference number
RR/51/89
Earliest possible date
01 June 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Augustus Daniel Imms

View page for Augustus Daniel Imms

Use this record

Citation

Augustus Daniel Imms, Referee's report by Augustus Daniel Imms, on a paper 'Investigations of the mechanism of the transmission of plant viruses by insect vectors.— I' by Harold Haydon Storey, 01 June 1933, RR/51/89, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_51_89/referees-report-by-augustus-daniel-imms-on-a-paper-investigations-of-the-mechanism-of-the-transmission-of-plant-viruses-by-insect-vectors-i-by-harold-haydon-storey, accessed on 22 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_51_89/referees-report-by-augustus-daniel-imms-on-a-paper-investigations-of-the-mechanism-of-the-transmission-of-plant-viruses-by-insect-vectors-i-by-harold-haydon-storey" title="Referee's report by Augustus Daniel Imms, on a paper 'Investigations of the mechanism of the transmission of plant viruses by insect vectors.— I' by Harold Haydon Storey" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection