Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests substituting reproductions of the models for the transverse sections, to improve clarity.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1932]

Endorsed on verso as received 13 February 1933.

Reference number
RR/51/77
Earliest possible date
February 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Henry Horatio Dixon

View page for Henry Horatio Dixon

Use this record

Citation

Henry Horatio Dixon, Referee's report by Henry Horatio Dixon, on a paper 'Experiments on Phyllotaxis. II. — The effect of displacing a primordium' by Mary Snow and R Snow, February 1933, RR/51/77, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_51_77/referees-report-by-henry-horatio-dixon-on-a-paper-experiments-on-phyllotaxis-ii-the-effect-of-displacing-a-primordium-by-mary-snow-and-r-snow, accessed on 15 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_51_77/referees-report-by-henry-horatio-dixon-on-a-paper-experiments-on-phyllotaxis-ii-the-effect-of-displacing-a-primordium-by-mary-snow-and-r-snow" title="Referee's report by Henry Horatio Dixon, on a paper 'Experiments on Phyllotaxis. II. — The effect of displacing a primordium' by Mary Snow and R Snow" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection