Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

No clear statement regarding publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The subject is outside his direct field of knowledge. Suggests the paper be submitted to Harold Roper Robinson. Has made a minor suggestion for the printers.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1935]

Endorsed on verso as received 15 October 1934.

Reference number
RR/51/27
Earliest possible date
October 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Charles Galton Darwin

View page for Charles Galton Darwin

Use this record

Citation

Charles Galton Darwin, Referee's report by Charles Galton Darwin, on a paper 'Auger effect in argon' by Leslie Harold Martin, J C Bower and Thomas Howell Laby, October 1934, RR/51/27, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_51_27/referees-report-by-charles-galton-darwin-on-a-paper-auger-effect-in-argon-by-leslie-harold-martin-j-c-bower-and-thomas-howell-laby, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_51_27/referees-report-by-charles-galton-darwin-on-a-paper-auger-effect-in-argon-by-leslie-harold-martin-j-c-bower-and-thomas-howell-laby" title="Referee's report by Charles Galton Darwin, on a paper 'Auger effect in argon' by Leslie Harold Martin, J C Bower and Thomas Howell Laby" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection