Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests the author should clearly state the advantages of the method used.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1934]

No received date.

Reference number
RR/51/144
Earliest possible date
1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Gordon Miller Bourne Dobson

View page for Gordon Miller Bourne Dobson

Use this record

Citation

Gordon Miller Bourne Dobson, Referee's report by Gordon Miller Bourne Dobson, on a paper 'A photoelectric spectrophotometer using dual electrostatic compensation' by Leonard A Woodward, 1933, RR/51/144, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_51_144/referees-report-by-gordon-miller-bourne-dobson-on-a-paper-a-photoelectric-spectrophotometer-using-dual-electrostatic-compensation-by-leonard-a-woodward, accessed on 24 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_51_144/referees-report-by-gordon-miller-bourne-dobson-on-a-paper-a-photoelectric-spectrophotometer-using-dual-electrostatic-compensation-by-leonard-a-woodward" title="Referee's report by Gordon Miller Bourne Dobson, on a paper 'A photoelectric spectrophotometer using dual electrostatic compensation' by Leonard A Woodward" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection