Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1933]

Endorsed on verso as received 11 September 1933.

Reference number
RR/51/103
Earliest possible date
September 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Herbert Parsons

View page for John Herbert Parsons

Use this record

Citation

John Herbert Parsons, Referee's report by John Herbert Parsons, on a paper 'Factors affecting the development and regeneration of visual purple in the mammalian retina' by Katharine Tansley, September 1933, RR/51/103, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_51_103/referees-report-by-john-herbert-parsons-on-a-paper-factors-affecting-the-development-and-regeneration-of-visual-purple-in-the-mammalian-retina-by-katharine-tansley, accessed on 22 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_51_103/referees-report-by-john-herbert-parsons-on-a-paper-factors-affecting-the-development-and-regeneration-of-visual-purple-in-the-mammalian-retina-by-katharine-tansley" title="Referee's report by John Herbert Parsons, on a paper 'Factors affecting the development and regeneration of visual purple in the mammalian retina' by Katharine Tansley" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection