Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. There is nothing new in the observations, but the attempted explanation is new. 'This is opposed to present-day neurological knowledge and conceptions, and would only raise a laugh, if published'.

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 21 March 1934.

Reference number
RR/51/1
Earliest possible date
20 March 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Charles Samuel Myers

View page for Charles Samuel Myers

Use this record

Citation

Charles Samuel Myers, Referee's report by Charles Samuel Myers, on a paper 'On directional fixity and the transitory visual image' by Frederick William Lanchester, 20 March 1933, RR/51/1, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_51_1/referees-report-by-charles-samuel-myers-on-a-paper-on-directional-fixity-and-the-transitory-visual-image-by-frederick-william-lanchester, accessed on 13 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_51_1/referees-report-by-charles-samuel-myers-on-a-paper-on-directional-fixity-and-the-transitory-visual-image-by-frederick-william-lanchester" title="Referee's report by Charles Samuel Myers, on a paper 'On directional fixity and the transitory visual image' by Frederick William Lanchester" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection