Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Engineering sciences

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. The paper will be valuable to researchers in this area. Some of the English should be corrected.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1933].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 February 1933.

Reference number
RR/50/75
Earliest possible date
February 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Geoffrey Ingram Taylor

View page for Geoffrey Ingram Taylor

Use this record

Citation

Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, Referee's report by Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, on a paper 'New method of deriving stresses graphically from photo-elastic observations' by H Neuber, February 1933, RR/50/75, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_50_75/referees-report-by-geoffrey-ingram-taylor-on-a-paper-new-method-of-deriving-stresses-graphically-from-photo-elastic-observations-by-h-neuber, accessed on 19 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_50_75/referees-report-by-geoffrey-ingram-taylor-on-a-paper-new-method-of-deriving-stresses-graphically-from-photo-elastic-observations-by-h-neuber" title="Referee's report by Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, on a paper 'New method of deriving stresses graphically from photo-elastic observations' by H Neuber" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection