Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

No recommended for publication in Proceedings. The results are very slight and not adequate enough to warrant publication. The conclusion is not of special value. He suspects that the author has been 'led into a futile line of research by someone who is concerned too much with what Thomson and Tait said in 1883'.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1934].

Endorsed on verso as received 7 April 1933.

Reference number
RR/50/70
Earliest possible date
April 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and note on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

James Hopwood Jeans

View page for James Hopwood Jeans

Use this record

Citation

James Hopwood Jeans, Referee's report by James Hopwood Jeans, on a paper 'The kelvin-poincare problem of stellar evolution' by V V Narlikar, April 1933, RR/50/70, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_50_70/referees-report-by-james-hopwood-jeans-on-a-paper-the-kelvin-poincare-problem-of-stellar-evolution-by-v-v-narlikar, accessed on 17 March 2026

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_50_70/referees-report-by-james-hopwood-jeans-on-a-paper-the-kelvin-poincare-problem-of-stellar-evolution-by-v-v-narlikar" title="Referee's report by James Hopwood Jeans, on a paper 'The kelvin-poincare problem of stellar evolution' by V V Narlikar" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection