Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, on a paper 'On the motion of an elliptic cylinder through a vicous fluid' by G J Richards

Reference number: RR/50/109

Date: 22 December 1933

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, in full.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1934].

Endorsed on verso as received 27 December 1933.

Reference number
RR/50/109
Earliest possible date
22 December 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Geoffrey Ingram Taylor

View page for Geoffrey Ingram Taylor

Use this record

Citation

Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, Referee's report by Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, on a paper 'On the motion of an elliptic cylinder through a vicous fluid' by G J Richards, 22 December 1933, RR/50/109, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_50_109/referees-report-by-geoffrey-ingram-taylor-on-a-paper-on-the-motion-of-an-elliptic-cylinder-through-a-vicous-fluid-by-g-j-richards, accessed on 18 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_50_109/referees-report-by-geoffrey-ingram-taylor-on-a-paper-on-the-motion-of-an-elliptic-cylinder-through-a-vicous-fluid-by-g-j-richards" title="Referee's report by Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, on a paper 'On the motion of an elliptic cylinder through a vicous fluid' by G J Richards" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection