Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Batholomew Price, on a paper 'On internal and external division in the calculus of symbols' by William Spottiswoode

Reference number: RR/4/250

Date: 06 March 1862

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, although modifications are needed. The paper should be returned to the author to modify.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1860].

Reference number
RR/4/250
Earliest possible date
06 March 1862
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Bartholomew Price

View page for Bartholomew Price

Use this record

Citation

Bartholomew Price, Referee's report by Batholomew Price, on a paper 'On internal and external division in the calculus of symbols' by William Spottiswoode, 06 March 1862, RR/4/250, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_4_250/referees-report-by-batholomew-price-on-a-paper-on-internal-and-external-division-in-the-calculus-of-symbols-by-william-spottiswoode, accessed on 17 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_4_250/referees-report-by-batholomew-price-on-a-paper-on-internal-and-external-division-in-the-calculus-of-symbols-by-william-spottiswoode" title="Referee's report by Batholomew Price, on a paper 'On internal and external division in the calculus of symbols' by William Spottiswoode" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection