Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Is satisfied with the rearrangement and revision. Still considers improvement could be made to punctuation.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1934]

Endorsed on verso as received 20 February 1934.

Reference number
RR/49/72
Earliest possible date
19 February 1934
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript
Typescript

Creator name

William Dickson Lang

View page for William Dickson Lang

Use this record

Citation

William Dickson Lang, Third referee's report by William Dickson Lang, on a paper 'The extinct of rhinoceroses of Baluchistan' by Clive Forster-Cooper, 19 February 1934, RR/49/72, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_49_72/third-referees-report-by-william-dickson-lang-on-a-paper-the-extinct-of-rhinoceroses-of-baluchistan-by-clive-forster-cooper, accessed on 09 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_49_72/third-referees-report-by-william-dickson-lang-on-a-paper-the-extinct-of-rhinoceroses-of-baluchistan-by-clive-forster-cooper" title="Third referee's report by William Dickson Lang, on a paper 'The extinct of rhinoceroses of Baluchistan' by Clive Forster-Cooper" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection