Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests revising the paper for details of form, including capitalisation of words.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1934]

Endorsed on verso as received 27 December 1933.

Reference number
RR/49/57
Earliest possible date
December 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Robert Muir

View page for Robert Muir

Use this record

Citation

Robert Muir, Referee's report by Robert Muir, on a paper 'Studies on epithelial phagocytosis. II. A method for demonstrating the origin of dust cells' by H M Carleton, December 1933, RR/49/57, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_49_57/referees-report-by-robert-muir-on-a-paper-studies-on-epithelial-phagocytosis-ii-a-method-for-demonstrating-the-origin-of-dust-cells-by-h-m-carleton, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_49_57/referees-report-by-robert-muir-on-a-paper-studies-on-epithelial-phagocytosis-ii-a-method-for-demonstrating-the-origin-of-dust-cells-by-h-m-carleton" title="Referee's report by Robert Muir, on a paper 'Studies on epithelial phagocytosis. II. A method for demonstrating the origin of dust cells' by H M Carleton" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection