Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Clearer reference to the figures should be made in the text. Suggests using updated terminology.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1934]

Endorsed on verso as received 15 November 1933.

Reference number
RR/49/15
Earliest possible date
November 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Peter Hill

View page for James Peter Hill

Use this record

Citation

James Peter Hill, Referee's report by James Peter Hill, on a paper 'The segmentation and chondrification of the skull of the duck' by Gavin Rylands De Beer and Ernest James William Barrington, November 1933, RR/49/15, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_49_15/referees-report-by-james-peter-hill-on-a-paper-the-segmentation-and-chondrification-of-the-skull-of-the-duck-by-gavin-rylands-de-beer-and-ernest-james-william-barrington, accessed on 25 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_49_15/referees-report-by-james-peter-hill-on-a-paper-the-segmentation-and-chondrification-of-the-skull-of-the-duck-by-gavin-rylands-de-beer-and-ernest-james-william-barrington" title="Referee's report by James Peter Hill, on a paper 'The segmentation and chondrification of the skull of the duck' by Gavin Rylands De Beer and Ernest James William Barrington" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection