Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests clarifying what the sectional plan represents.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1934]

Endorsed on verso as received 13 October 1933.

Reference number
RR/49/105
Earliest possible date
October 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Henry Eccles

View page for William Henry Eccles

Use this record

Citation

William Henry Eccles, Referee's report by William Henry Eccles, on a paper 'The valve maintained tuning fork as a primary standard of frequency' by William David Dye and Louis Essen, October 1933, RR/49/105, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_49_105/referees-report-by-william-henry-eccles-on-a-paper-the-valve-maintained-tuning-fork-as-a-primary-standard-of-frequency-by-william-david-dye-and-louis-essen, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_49_105/referees-report-by-william-henry-eccles-on-a-paper-the-valve-maintained-tuning-fork-as-a-primary-standard-of-frequency-by-william-david-dye-and-louis-essen" title="Referee's report by William Henry Eccles, on a paper 'The valve maintained tuning fork as a primary standard of frequency' by William David Dye and Louis Essen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection