Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. 'It is just of sufficient importance to be published but no more'. Considers the paper more suitable for the Philosophical Magazine or the London Physical Society.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1934]

Endorsed on verso as received 20 September 1933.

Reference number
RR/48/49
Earliest possible date
September 1933
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Cunningham McLennan

View page for John Cunningham McLennan

Use this record

Citation

John Cunningham McLennan, Referee's report by John Cunningham McLennan, on a paper 'The thermal expansion of bismuth by X-ray measurements' by A H Jay, September 1933, RR/48/49, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_48_49/referees-report-by-john-cunningham-mclennan-on-a-paper-the-thermal-expansion-of-bismuth-by-x-ray-measurements-by-a-h-jay, accessed on 11 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_48_49/referees-report-by-john-cunningham-mclennan-on-a-paper-the-thermal-expansion-of-bismuth-by-x-ray-measurements-by-a-h-jay" title="Referee's report by John Cunningham McLennan, on a paper 'The thermal expansion of bismuth by X-ray measurements' by A H Jay" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection