Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by James Peter Hill, on a paper 'Experimental distortion of development in amphibian tadpoles. Part II' by D E Sladden

Reference number: RR/47/99

Date: July 1932

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. The typescript requires revision.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1932].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 July 1932.

Reference number
RR/47/99
Earliest possible date
July 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Peter Hill

View page for James Peter Hill

Use this record

Citation

James Peter Hill, Referee's report by James Peter Hill, on a paper 'Experimental distortion of development in amphibian tadpoles. Part II' by D E Sladden, July 1932, RR/47/99, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_47_99/referees-report-by-james-peter-hill-on-a-paper-experimental-distortion-of-development-in-amphibian-tadpoles-part-ii-by-d-e-sladden, accessed on 09 December 2023

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_47_99/referees-report-by-james-peter-hill-on-a-paper-experimental-distortion-of-development-in-amphibian-tadpoles-part-ii-by-d-e-sladden" title="Referee's report by James Peter Hill, on a paper 'Experimental distortion of development in amphibian tadpoles. Part II' by D E Sladden" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection