Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, if shortened. The theoretical discussions should be shortened without omitting important experimental details.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1933].

Endorsed on verso as received 11 November 1932.

Reference number
RR/47/62
Earliest possible date
November 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton

View page for Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton

Use this record

Citation

Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, Referee's report by Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, on a paper 'Thermal decomposition and detonation of mercury fulminate' by William Edward Garner and H R Hailes, November 1932, RR/47/62, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_47_62/referees-report-by-alfred-charles-glyn-egerton-on-a-paper-thermal-decomposition-and-detonation-of-mercury-fulminate-by-william-edward-garner-and-h-r-hailes, accessed on 10 November 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_47_62/referees-report-by-alfred-charles-glyn-egerton-on-a-paper-thermal-decomposition-and-detonation-of-mercury-fulminate-by-william-edward-garner-and-h-r-hailes" title="Referee's report by Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, on a paper 'Thermal decomposition and detonation of mercury fulminate' by William Edward Garner and H R Hailes" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection