Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

He doesn't feel too favourable about the paper and doesn't undertand the Tensor calculus well enough to give an opinion. It is the author's 'third or fourth shot at this problem', as early ones were erroneous and it 'seems to get more complicated rather than more simple at each successive attempt'. A report from Dirac should be sought. The paper will probably be suitable for publication.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1932].

Endorsed on verso as received 16 June 1932.

Reference number
RR/47/32
Earliest possible date
15 April 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D), note on paper and letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

James Hopwood Jeans

View page for James Hopwood Jeans

Use this record

Citation

James Hopwood Jeans, Referee's report by James Hopwood Jeans, on a paper 'Theory of electric charge' by Arthur Stanley Eddington, 15 April 1932, RR/47/32, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_47_32/referees-report-by-james-hopwood-jeans-on-a-paper-theory-of-electric-charge-by-arthur-stanley-eddington, accessed on 16 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_47_32/referees-report-by-james-hopwood-jeans-on-a-paper-theory-of-electric-charge-by-arthur-stanley-eddington" title="Referee's report by James Hopwood Jeans, on a paper 'Theory of electric charge' by Arthur Stanley Eddington" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection