Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

The work is lacking in precision, but it shouldn't be rejected because of this. Admires the way that the authors obtained the data from such a vague phenomenon.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1933].

Endorsed on verso as received 6 October 1932.

Reference number
RR/47/21
Earliest possible date
05 October 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Thomas Martin Lowry

View page for Thomas Martin Lowry

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Martin Lowry, Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'On the absorption spectra of some higher oxides' by Arun K Dutta and Prabhat K Sen Gupta, 05 October 1932, RR/47/21, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_47_21/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-on-the-absorption-spectra-of-some-higher-oxides-by-arun-k-dutta-and-prabhat-k-sen-gupta, accessed on 03 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_47_21/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-on-the-absorption-spectra-of-some-higher-oxides-by-arun-k-dutta-and-prabhat-k-sen-gupta" title="Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'On the absorption spectra of some higher oxides' by Arun K Dutta and Prabhat K Sen Gupta" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection