Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The paper is of 'inordinate length' and will be expensive to publish.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1932].

Endorsed on verso as received 12 September 1932.

Reference number
RR/47/124
Earliest possible date
09 September 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and note on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Dukinfield Henry Scott

View page for Dukinfield Henry Scott

Use this record

Citation

Dukinfield Henry Scott, Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'On some pteridospermous plants from the Mesozoic rocks of South Africa' by Hugh Hamshaw Thomas, 09 September 1932, RR/47/124, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_47_124/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-on-some-pteridospermous-plants-from-the-mesozoic-rocks-of-south-africa-by-hugh-hamshaw-thomas, accessed on 11 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_47_124/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-on-some-pteridospermous-plants-from-the-mesozoic-rocks-of-south-africa-by-hugh-hamshaw-thomas" title="Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'On some pteridospermous plants from the Mesozoic rocks of South Africa' by Hugh Hamshaw Thomas" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection