Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1932].

Endorsed on verso as received 17 March 1932.

Reference number
RR/47/115
Earliest possible date
March 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Charles Grant Ledingham

View page for John Charles Grant Ledingham

Use this record

Citation

John Charles Grant Ledingham, Second referee's report by John Charles Grant Ledingham, on a paper 'The morphology and cytology of bacterium malvacearum, E. F. S. Part II.—Reproduction and cell-fusion' by R H Stoughton, March 1932, RR/47/115, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_47_115/second-referees-report-by-john-charles-grant-ledingham-on-a-paper-the-morphology-and-cytology-of-bacterium-malvacearum-e-f-s-part-iireproduction-and-cell-fusion-by-r-h-stoughton, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_47_115/second-referees-report-by-john-charles-grant-ledingham-on-a-paper-the-morphology-and-cytology-of-bacterium-malvacearum-e-f-s-part-iireproduction-and-cell-fusion-by-r-h-stoughton" title="Second referee's report by John Charles Grant Ledingham, on a paper 'The morphology and cytology of bacterium malvacearum, E. F. S. Part II.—Reproduction and cell-fusion' by R H Stoughton" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection