Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Until a useful application is found for the tables of data the paper should not be published by the Royal Society.

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 10 August 1932.

Reference number
RR/45/98
Earliest possible date
August 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Ronald Aylmer Fisher

View page for Ronald Aylmer Fisher

Use this record

Citation

Ronald Aylmer Fisher, Referee's report by Ronald Aylmer Fisher, on a paper 'The correlation of relatives on the supposition of sex-linked transmission' by Lancelot Thomas Hogben, August 1932, RR/45/98, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_45_98/referees-report-by-ronald-aylmer-fisher-on-a-paper-the-correlation-of-relatives-on-the-supposition-of-sex-linked-transmission-by-lancelot-thomas-hogben, accessed on 22 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_45_98/referees-report-by-ronald-aylmer-fisher-on-a-paper-the-correlation-of-relatives-on-the-supposition-of-sex-linked-transmission-by-lancelot-thomas-hogben" title="Referee's report by Ronald Aylmer Fisher, on a paper 'The correlation of relatives on the supposition of sex-linked transmission' by Lancelot Thomas Hogben" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection