Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The paper is long and somewhat tedious to follow. Suggests adding a clear statement of 'materials examined and methods employed'. Refers to work of Storch [?]. Suggests shortening the discussion and the excessively repetitive criticisms of the work of Storch.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1932]

Endorsed on verso as received 21 July 1932.

Reference number
RR/45/70
Earliest possible date
20 July 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Stanley Wells Kemp

View page for Stanley Wells Kemp

Use this record

Citation

Stanley Wells Kemp, Referee's report by Stanley Wells Kemp, on a paper 'On the feeding mechanism of the Branchiopoda' by Herbert Graham Cannon, 20 July 1932, RR/45/70, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_45_70/referees-report-by-stanley-wells-kemp-on-a-paper-on-the-feeding-mechanism-of-the-branchiopoda-by-herbert-graham-cannon, accessed on 06 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_45_70/referees-report-by-stanley-wells-kemp-on-a-paper-on-the-feeding-mechanism-of-the-branchiopoda-by-herbert-graham-cannon" title="Referee's report by Stanley Wells Kemp, on a paper 'On the feeding mechanism of the Branchiopoda' by Herbert Graham Cannon" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection