Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Finds the style diffuse. Suggests shortening the introduction and the experimental section. Suggests omitting the summary.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1932]

Endorsed on verso as received 24 May 1932.

Reference number
RR/45/56
Earliest possible date
23 May 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Gilbert Thomas Morgan

View page for Gilbert Thomas Morgan

Use this record

Citation

Gilbert Thomas Morgan, Referee's report by Gilbert Thomas Morgan, on a paper 'The condensation of bromal with urea' by Frederick Daniel Chattaway and Eric John Francis James, 23 May 1932, RR/45/56, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_45_56/referees-report-by-gilbert-thomas-morgan-on-a-paper-the-condensation-of-bromal-with-urea-by-frederick-daniel-chattaway-and-eric-john-francis-james, accessed on 22 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_45_56/referees-report-by-gilbert-thomas-morgan-on-a-paper-the-condensation-of-bromal-with-urea-by-frederick-daniel-chattaway-and-eric-john-francis-james" title="Referee's report by Gilbert Thomas Morgan, on a paper 'The condensation of bromal with urea' by Frederick Daniel Chattaway and Eric John Francis James" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection