Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Chemistry

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The subject is interesting and the methods satisfactory. However, does not think the experiments are sufficiently extensive to validate the formulae.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1932]

Endorsed on verso as received 4 May 1932.

Reference number
RR/45/40
Earliest possible date
May 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Cyril Norman Hinshelwood

View page for Cyril Norman Hinshelwood

Use this record

Citation

Cyril Norman Hinshelwood, Referee's report by Cyril Norman Hinshelwood, on a paper 'On the mass rate of reactions in solids' by R S Bradley, James Colvin and J Hume, May 1932, RR/45/40, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_45_40/referees-report-by-cyril-norman-hinshelwood-on-a-paper-on-the-mass-rate-of-reactions-in-solids-by-r-s-bradley-james-colvin-and-j-hume, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_45_40/referees-report-by-cyril-norman-hinshelwood-on-a-paper-on-the-mass-rate-of-reactions-in-solids-by-r-s-bradley-james-colvin-and-j-hume" title="Referee's report by Cyril Norman Hinshelwood, on a paper 'On the mass rate of reactions in solids' by R S Bradley, James Colvin and J Hume" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection