Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, in full. Detailed accounts of electric field of thunderclouds in different parts of the world are needed and the author should be allowed the opportunity to put forward his own interpretation of the results.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1933].

Endorsed on verso as received 2 July 1931.

Reference number
RR/44/37
Earliest possible date
July 1931
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Charles Thomson Rees Wilson

View page for Charles Thomson Rees Wilson

Use this record

Citation

Charles Thomson Rees Wilson, Referee's report by Charles Thomson Rees Wilson, on a paper 'The electric field of overhead thunderclouds' by Sudhansu Kumar Banerji, July 1931, RR/44/37, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_44_37/referees-report-by-charles-thomson-rees-wilson-on-a-paper-the-electric-field-of-overhead-thunderclouds-by-sudhansu-kumar-banerji, accessed on 18 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_44_37/referees-report-by-charles-thomson-rees-wilson-on-a-paper-the-electric-field-of-overhead-thunderclouds-by-sudhansu-kumar-banerji" title="Referee's report by Charles Thomson Rees Wilson, on a paper 'The electric field of overhead thunderclouds' by Sudhansu Kumar Banerji" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection