Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1932].

Endorsed on verso as received 28 July 1932.

Reference number
RR/44/32
Earliest possible date
July 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Francis Hugh Adam Marshall

View page for Francis Hugh Adam Marshall

Use this record

Citation

Francis Hugh Adam Marshall, Referee's report by Francis Hugh Adam Marshall, on a paper 'Factors affecting the breeding of the field mouse (microtus agrestis). Part II.—Temperature and food' by John Randal Baker and R M Ranson, July 1932, RR/44/32, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_44_32/referees-report-by-francis-hugh-adam-marshall-on-a-paper-factors-affecting-the-breeding-of-the-field-mouse-microtus-agrestis-part-iitemperature-and-food-by-john-randal-baker-and-r-m-ranson, accessed on 05 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_44_32/referees-report-by-francis-hugh-adam-marshall-on-a-paper-factors-affecting-the-breeding-of-the-field-mouse-microtus-agrestis-part-iitemperature-and-food-by-john-randal-baker-and-r-m-ranson" title="Referee's report by Francis Hugh Adam Marshall, on a paper 'Factors affecting the breeding of the field mouse (microtus agrestis). Part II.—Temperature and food' by John Randal Baker and R M Ranson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection