Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on a paper 'A research on Faraday's "steel and alloys"' by Robert Abbott Hadfield

Reference number: RR/43/47

Date: July 1931

Description

Sectional committee: Engineering sciences

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, so long as it is abbreviated. There is lots of repetition in the paper which requires shortening.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1932].

Endorsed on verso as received 8 July 1931.

Reference number
RR/43/47
Earliest possible date
July 1931
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and note on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

Cecil Henry Desch

View page for Cecil Henry Desch

Use this record

Citation

Cecil Henry Desch, Referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on a paper 'A research on Faraday's "steel and alloys"' by Robert Abbott Hadfield, July 1931, RR/43/47, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_43_47/referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-a-paper-a-research-on-faradays-steel-and-alloys-by-robert-abbott-hadfield, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_43_47/referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-a-paper-a-research-on-faradays-steel-and-alloys-by-robert-abbott-hadfield" title="Referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on a paper 'A research on Faraday's "steel and alloys"' by Robert Abbott Hadfield" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection