Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Not recommended for publication in Proceedings. The first paragraph still contains statements which are 'palpably fallacious and misleading'. The paper should be modified to rectify this.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 January 1932,

Reference number
RR/43/153
Earliest possible date
20 June 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

William Arthur Bone

View page for William Arthur Bone

Use this record

Citation

William Arthur Bone, Second referee's report by William Arthur Bone, on a paper 'Flame speeds during the inflammation of moist carbonic oxide-oxygen mixtures' by W Payman and R W Wheeler, 20 June 1932, RR/43/153, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_43_153/second-referees-report-by-william-arthur-bone-on-a-paper-flame-speeds-during-the-inflammation-of-moist-carbonic-oxide-oxygen-mixtures-by-w-payman-and-r-w-wheeler, accessed on 12 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_43_153/second-referees-report-by-william-arthur-bone-on-a-paper-flame-speeds-during-the-inflammation-of-moist-carbonic-oxide-oxygen-mixtures-by-w-payman-and-r-w-wheeler" title="Second referee's report by William Arthur Bone, on a paper 'Flame speeds during the inflammation of moist carbonic oxide-oxygen mixtures' by W Payman and R W Wheeler" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection