Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Not recommended for publication. The paper would be better published in the journal of the Chemical Society.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 26 February 1932.

Reference number
RR/43/151
Earliest possible date
February 1932
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton

View page for Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton

Use this record

Citation

Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, Second referee's report by Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, on a paper 'Flame speeds during the inflammation of moist carbonic oxide-oxygen mixtures' by W Payman and R W Wheeler, February 1932, RR/43/151, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_43_151/second-referees-report-by-alfred-charles-glyn-egerton-on-a-paper-flame-speeds-during-the-inflammation-of-moist-carbonic-oxide-oxygen-mixtures-by-w-payman-and-r-w-wheeler, accessed on 08 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_43_151/second-referees-report-by-alfred-charles-glyn-egerton-on-a-paper-flame-speeds-during-the-inflammation-of-moist-carbonic-oxide-oxygen-mixtures-by-w-payman-and-r-w-wheeler" title="Second referee's report by Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, on a paper 'Flame speeds during the inflammation of moist carbonic oxide-oxygen mixtures' by W Payman and R W Wheeler" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection