Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

The part dealing with the effects to which the electrolytes may stand is 'really good', but still not worthy of a Royal Society publication. The main points should be expressed more precisely.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1932].

Endorsed on verso as received 18 November 1931.

Reference number
RR/43/133
Earliest possible date
November 1931
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and note on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Gray

View page for James Gray

Use this record

Citation

James Gray, Second referee's report by James Gray, on a paper 'The development and function of the heart and pericardium in echinodermata' by Nidambur Narasimhamurti, November 1931, RR/43/133, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_43_133/second-referees-report-by-james-gray-on-a-paper-the-development-and-function-of-the-heart-and-pericardium-in-echinodermata-by-nidambur-narasimhamurti, accessed on 14 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_43_133/second-referees-report-by-james-gray-on-a-paper-the-development-and-function-of-the-heart-and-pericardium-in-echinodermata-by-nidambur-narasimhamurti" title="Second referee's report by James Gray, on a paper 'The development and function of the heart and pericardium in echinodermata' by Nidambur Narasimhamurti" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection