Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. The last paragraph is unclear and should be amplified.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1931].

Endorsed on verso as received 10 March 1931.

Reference number
RR/43/104
Earliest possible date
9 March 1931
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Thomas Martin Lowry

View page for Thomas Martin Lowry

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Martin Lowry, Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'Viscosity and rigidity in suspensions of fine particles. II.—Non-aqueous suspensions' by C M McDowell and Francis L Usher, 9 March 1931, RR/43/104, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_43_104/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-viscosity-and-rigidity-in-suspensions-of-fine-particles-iinon-aqueous-suspensions-by-c-m-mcdowell-and-francis-l-usher, accessed on 26 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_43_104/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-viscosity-and-rigidity-in-suspensions-of-fine-particles-iinon-aqueous-suspensions-by-c-m-mcdowell-and-francis-l-usher" title="Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'Viscosity and rigidity in suspensions of fine particles. II.—Non-aqueous suspensions' by C M McDowell and Francis L Usher" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection