Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. The paper is concise and well written.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1930].

Endorsed on verso as received 11 November 1930.

Reference number
RR/41/5
Earliest possible date
November 1930
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edward Charles Cyril Baly

View page for Edward Charles Cyril Baly

Use this record

Citation

Edward Charles Cyril Baly, Referee's report by Edward Charles Cyril Baly, on a paper 'The sorption of carbon tetrachloride at low pressures by activated charcoals. Part IV' by Arthur John Allmand and A Puttick, November 1930, RR/41/5, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_41_5/referees-report-by-edward-charles-cyril-baly-on-a-paper-the-sorption-of-carbon-tetrachloride-at-low-pressures-by-activated-charcoals-part-iv-by-arthur-john-allmand-and-a-puttick, accessed on 13 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_41_5/referees-report-by-edward-charles-cyril-baly-on-a-paper-the-sorption-of-carbon-tetrachloride-at-low-pressures-by-activated-charcoals-part-iv-by-arthur-john-allmand-and-a-puttick" title="Referee's report by Edward Charles Cyril Baly, on a paper 'The sorption of carbon tetrachloride at low pressures by activated charcoals. Part IV' by Arthur John Allmand and A Puttick" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection