Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, with modifications. The measurements are valuable but the presentation of them is inadequate. It should instead be written on a 'strict physical basis'.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1930].

Endorsed on verso as received 13 March 1930.

Reference number
RR/40/4
Earliest possible date
May 1930
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and note on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Chadwick

View page for James Chadwick

Use this record

Citation

James Chadwick, Referee's report by James Chadwick, on a paper 'Secondary electronic emissions from metal foils and animal tissues' by William Valentine Mayneord, May 1930, RR/40/4, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_40_4/referees-report-by-james-chadwick-on-a-paper-secondary-electronic-emissions-from-metal-foils-and-animal-tissues-by-william-valentine-mayneord, accessed on 10 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_40_4/referees-report-by-james-chadwick-on-a-paper-secondary-electronic-emissions-from-metal-foils-and-animal-tissues-by-william-valentine-mayneord" title="Referee's report by James Chadwick, on a paper 'Secondary electronic emissions from metal foils and animal tissues' by William Valentine Mayneord" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection