Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Grafton Elliot Smith, on a paper 'An experimental verification of the gesture theory of speech' by Richard Paget

Reference number: RR/40/27

Date: November 1929

Description

Sectional committee: [Physiology]

Not recommended for publication in Proceedings, as it is too speculative. The correlations claimed by the author are not clear enough.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 6 November 1929.

Reference number
RR/40/27
Earliest possible date
November 1929
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Grafton Elliot Smith

View page for Grafton Elliot Smith

Use this record

Citation

Grafton Elliot Smith, Referee's report by Grafton Elliot Smith, on a paper 'An experimental verification of the gesture theory of speech' by Richard Paget, November 1929, RR/40/27, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_40_27/referees-report-by-grafton-elliot-smith-on-a-paper-an-experimental-verification-of-the-gesture-theory-of-speech-by-richard-paget, accessed on 24 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_40_27/referees-report-by-grafton-elliot-smith-on-a-paper-an-experimental-verification-of-the-gesture-theory-of-speech-by-richard-paget" title="Referee's report by Grafton Elliot Smith, on a paper 'An experimental verification of the gesture theory of speech' by Richard Paget" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection