Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The paper contains new facts but there is 'long, unecessary repetition' which should be modified. There are many grammatical errors and the table should be revised.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1931].

Endorsed on verso as received 17 October 1929.

Reference number
RR/40/12
Earliest possible date
October 1929
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Stephen Goodrich

View page for Edwin Stephen Goodrich

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Stephen Goodrich, Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'On the development of the vertebral column of Anura' by Himadri Kumar Mookerjee, October 1929, RR/40/12, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_40_12/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-on-the-development-of-the-vertebral-column-of-anura-by-himadri-kumar-mookerjee, accessed on 22 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_40_12/referees-report-by-edwin-stephen-goodrich-on-a-paper-on-the-development-of-the-vertebral-column-of-anura-by-himadri-kumar-mookerjee" title="Referee's report by Edwin Stephen Goodrich, on a paper 'On the development of the vertebral column of Anura' by Himadri Kumar Mookerjee" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection