Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions.

Subject: Engineering

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1856].

Reference number
RR/3/79
Earliest possible date
30 July 1856
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Tyndall

View page for John Tyndall

Use this record

Citation

John Tyndall, Referee's report by John Tyndall, on a paper 'On various phenomena of refraction through semi-lenses or prisms, producing anomalies in the illusion of stereoscopic images' by Antoine Jean Francois Claudet, 30 July 1856, RR/3/79, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_3_79/referees-report-by-john-tyndall-on-a-paper-on-various-phenomena-of-refraction-through-semi-lenses-or-prisms-producing-anomalies-in-the-illusion-of-stereoscopic-images-by-antoine-jean-francois-claudet, accessed on 12 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_3_79/referees-report-by-john-tyndall-on-a-paper-on-various-phenomena-of-refraction-through-semi-lenses-or-prisms-producing-anomalies-in-the-illusion-of-stereoscopic-images-by-antoine-jean-francois-claudet" title="Referee's report by John Tyndall, on a paper 'On various phenomena of refraction through semi-lenses or prisms, producing anomalies in the illusion of stereoscopic images' by Antoine Jean Francois Claudet" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection