Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Edward Mourrier Boxer, on a paper 'On the nature of the action of fired gunpowder' by Lynall Thomas

Reference number: RR/3/260

Date: 21 December 1858

Description

Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. There are 'erroneous' calculations in the paper and the conclusion that the author comes to is not a 'legitimate deduction'.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1857].

Reference number
RR/3/260
Earliest possible date
21 December 1858
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edward Mourrier Boxer

View page for Edward Mourrier Boxer

Use this record

Citation

Edward Mourrier Boxer, Referee's report by Edward Mourrier Boxer, on a paper 'On the nature of the action of fired gunpowder' by Lynall Thomas, 21 December 1858, RR/3/260, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_3_260/referees-report-by-edward-mourrier-boxer-on-a-paper-on-the-nature-of-the-action-of-fired-gunpowder-by-lynall-thomas, accessed on 13 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_3_260/referees-report-by-edward-mourrier-boxer-on-a-paper-on-the-nature-of-the-action-of-fired-gunpowder-by-lynall-thomas" title="Referee's report by Edward Mourrier Boxer, on a paper 'On the nature of the action of fired gunpowder' by Lynall Thomas" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection