Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

The Royal Society: Science in the Making

Referee's report by Thomas Bell, on a paper 'On the Scelidothere' by Richard Owen

Reference number: RR/3/208

Date: 20 November 1856

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, with illustrations.

Subject: Zoology

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1857].

Reference number
RR/3/208
Earliest possible date
20 November 1856
Physical description
Report on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Bell

View page for Thomas Bell

Use this record

IIIF manifest

View​ IIIF ​ manifest Opens in new tab

Open in Mirador viewer Opens in new tab

Export this record

Download PDF Opens in new tab

Citation

Thomas Bell, Referee's report by Thomas Bell, on a paper 'On the Scelidothere' by Richard Owen, 20 November 1856, RR/3/208, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_3_208/referees-report-by-thomas-bell-on-a-paper-on-the-scelidothere-by-richard-owen, accessed on 09 October 2024

Link to this record

https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_3_208/referees-report-by-thomas-bell-on-a-paper-on-the-scelidothere-by-richard-owen

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_3_208/referees-report-by-thomas-bell-on-a-paper-on-the-scelidothere-by-richard-owen" title="Referee's report by Thomas Bell, on a paper 'On the Scelidothere' by Richard Owen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Hierarchy

This item is part of:

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection